|
|
PDF (Adobe Portable Document Format) and .doc files (Microsoft Word format) of the overheads used in this presentation are available from the Survey of Theology Page or the Download page.
Topics 1. The Place of Humanity in Creation 1.1. Implications of Being Made in the Image of God 1.2. Image of God Versus the Likeness of God
3. Augustine's Doctrines of Sin and Grace
4. Thomas Aquinas' Doctrine of Grace 4.1. Grace as God's Presence Versus Grace as a Divine Infusion 4.2.1. The Need for Habitual Grace 4.2.2. The Three Facets of Habitual Grace 4.2.3. Habitual Grace as the Basis for Salvation
5. The Doctrine of Justification by Faith 5.1. Luther: The Alien Righteous of God and Forensic Justification 5.2. Calvin: the Double Grace of "Mystical Union" 5.3. The Differing Terminology Used by Reformers and the Catholic Church 5.3.1 The Reformer's Terminology 5.3.2. The Catholic Terminology
6.1. Augustine's View of Predestination 6.2. The Reformed Orthodoxy View of Predestination 6.2.2. The Angst of Calvinist Spirituality 6.4. An Anglican View on Predestination
7.1. Where Did Sinful Human Nature Come From? 7.2. Classic Explanation of Sinful Human Nature 7.3. Problems with the Classic Explanation 7.4. The Mystery of "Original Sin"
1. The Place of Humanity in Creation 1.1. Implications of Being Made in the Image of God " So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them." - Genesis 1:26-27 (NRSV)
" - Talmud (Derech Eretz Zutta 10,5)
Implications of humankind being made in the image of God (Latin: imago Dei):
" - Philip Sherrard
1.2. Image of God Versus the Likeness of God "Image of God" versus "Likeness of God" was a distinction made by some early Church Fathers, and by the Orthodox Church today:
Redemption involves bringing the "image of God" in us to fulfillment -- into the "likeness of God"
2. The Pelagian Heresy 2.1. Pelagius Pelagius
2.2. Pelagius' Teachings Pelagius:
3. Augustine's Doctrines of Sin and Grace 3.1. Human Free Will Human Free Will
3.2. Sin 3.2.1. Individual Sin Individual sin is:
3.2.2. Original Sin As a consequence of "the Fall," every human being is born with a disposition to sin which we cannot by ourselves overcome ("original sin") Analogies for "original sin:"
3.3. Grace Grace heals and liberates us, and brings us forgiveness
Augustine defined three categories of grace:
3.4. The Basis for Salvation The basis for our salvation is:
4. Thomas Aquinas' Doctrine of Grace 4.1. Grace as God's Presence Versus Grace as a Divine Infusion
4.2. Habitual Grace 4.2.1. The Need for Habitual Grace
4.2.2. The Three Facets of Habitual Grace Three facets of Habitual Grace:
4.2.3. Habitual Grace as the Basis for Salvation The presence of Habitual Grace in us is the basis for our salvation, for it changes our nature, making it acceptable for God to dwell within us (slogan: gratia gratis faciens: "grace which makes pleasing")
5. The Doctrine of Justification by Faith 5.1. Luther: The Alien Righteous of God and Forensic Justification Luther:
Whereas Augustine said:
Luther said:
5.2. Calvin: the Double Grace of "Mystical Union" Calvin: Faith unites the believer to Christ in a "mystical union." This union provides a two effects (a "double grace")
5.3. The Differing Terminology Used by Reformers and the Catholic Church 5.3.1 The Reformer's Terminology The terminology used by the Protestant reformers (Luther, Melanchthon, Calvin):
5.3.2. The Catholic Terminology When Roman Catholics at the time spoke of "Justification" they included in the one term "Justification" what the Protestant Reformers had divided up into "Justification" and "Sanctification." Catholics felt that justification included a sense of both the beginning and the continuation/growth of Christian life. They considered these two aspects of the same thing. The two aspects of the Catholic sense of justification were later divided up into:
Catholic View: Catholic Justification = Reformer's Justification and Sanctification
" - McGrath
"Protestants speak of a declaration of justice and Catholics of a making just. But Protestants speak of a declaring just which includes a making just; and Catholics of a making just which supposes a declaring just. Is it not time to stop arguing about imaginary differences?" - Hans Küng
6.1. Augustine's View of Predestination There is a "dark side" to Augustine's doctrine of grace, an extreme that his battles with the Pelagians may have driven him to:
From this argument followed the idea of predestination: God chooses who will be saved (the "elect") by deciding who will be given God's grace
At least once Augustine suggests there is "double predestination" -- God elects some to salvation -- and elects the rest to damnation. Most of the time, Augustine speaks only of "single predestination" -- i.e. of God electing some to salvation.
6.2. The Reformed Orthodoxy View of Predestination 6.2.1. Synod of Dort The views of Calvin and Theodore Beza were formulated by Reformed Orthodoxy in the Synod of Dort 1618-19. The doctrine of this council is often remembered by the mnenomic "TULIP"
6.2.2. The Angst of Calvinist Spirituality The Angst of Calvinist Spirituality: "Am I really among the elect?"
6.3. Arminianism Jakob Arminius (1560-1609) was a reformed Minister who opposed the Reformed doctrine of limited atonement (= "particular redemption"). His teachings:
6.4. An Anglican View on Predestination The classic Reformed Orthodoxy view of predestination is not "good news" (= gospel).
"God wills to save all people, to bring them to their fulfillment in relation to God and to their fellows (1 Tim. 2:4). God does not will to save only certain persons and to reject others. The doctrine of double predestination turns God into a monster who does not deserve our worship and obedience. It also undercuts human freedom and responsibility and makes the mission of the church pointless." - Owen Thomas and Ellen K. Wondra, In Introduction to Theology. Third Edition, page 216
7. The Fall = Original Sin 7.1. Where Did Sinful Human Nature Come From? The Problem:
7.2. Classic Explanation of Sinful Human Nature The classic explanation for a sinful human nature is the idea of "Original Sin":
7.3. Problems with the Classic Explanation The problem with this classic explanation of "original sin" is that the story of Adam and Eve is not historical fact, but must be considered a myth telling us something of the nature of human existence.
What is the story of the fall of Adam and Eve and the classic doctrine of Original Sin telling us about human existence? Haight suggests:
7.4. The Mystery of "Original Sin" The ultimate explanation for why:
must be considered a mystery that is related to the mystery of theodicy (the problem of why there is evil and suffering in the world)
"The Doctrines of Human Nature, Sin, and Grace," Chapter 14 in: Christian Theology. An Introduction. Third Edition. Alister E. McGrath, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 2001 "Sin," Part 6 in: Christian Theology, Second Edition. Millard J. Erickson, Baker Books, Grand Rapids, 1998 "Sin," Chapter 9, and "Election and Predestination," Chapter 13 in: Introduction to Theology. Third Edition. Owen C. Thomas, Ellen K. Wondra. Morehouse Publishing, Harrisburg, 2002 "Sin and Grace" by Roger Haight, Chapter 7 in: Systemic Theology. Roman Catholic Perspectives, Volume 2, Francis Fiorenza, John Galvin (eds.), Fortress Press, Minneapolis, 1991. "God as Creator," Chapter 3 in: The Orthodox Way, Bishop Kallistos Ware, St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, Crestwood, NY 1979
|
|
|